<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SEim Effects Photo Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects</link>
	<description>Seim Lightroom Presets, Photoshop Actions, Tips</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raw vs Jpeg. With Lightroom Presets &#038; Workflow In Mind! by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/01/30/raw-vs-jpeg-with-lightroom-presets-workflow-in-mind/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/01/30/raw-vs-jpeg-with-lightroom-presets-workflow-in-mind/#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>Lightroom photos only look bad because most people dont know how to process RAW photos. Real pros DO use Lightroom. Check out benchrisman.com for example. Those are the best photos out there - all done in Lightroom. Lightroom requires users to dial in most of the settings, and people just dont have an eye for whats correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightroom photos only look bad because most people dont know how to process RAW photos. Real pros DO use Lightroom. Check out benchrisman.com for example. Those are the best photos out there - all done in Lightroom. Lightroom requires users to dial in most of the settings, and people just dont have an eye for whats correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Lightroom presets for workflow and special effects by My Workflow &#124; Part 4: Processing &#187; Phill Price &#124; Photography</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2007/09/25/some-free-lightroom-workflow-and-effect-presets/#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>My Workflow &#124; Part 4: Processing &#187; Phill Price &#124; Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2007/09/25/some-free-lightroom-workflow-and-effect-presets/#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>[...] Auto -WB : from proPhotoShow.net - as if it were processed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Auto -WB : from proPhotoShow.net - as if it were processed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Merry Christmas From Seim Effects &#038; The Family by Frank</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/12/25/merry-christmas-from-seim-effects-the-family/#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/?p=700#comment-3001</guid>
		<description>Beautiful collage!  Merry Christmas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful collage!  Merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Raw vs Jpeg. With Lightroom Presets &#038; Workflow In Mind! by Mike</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/01/30/raw-vs-jpeg-with-lightroom-presets-workflow-in-mind/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/01/30/raw-vs-jpeg-with-lightroom-presets-workflow-in-mind/#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>I've always found it odd that people continue to use Adobe products to process RAW files.  They look inexcusably AWFUL and it's no surprise that real pros.  That's, REAL pros...Joe McNally, Bruce Dale, etc...not the online pros that abound these days....do not use softwares such as Lightroom or Aperture.  They use Capture NX, or Canon's DPP.  Why?  It looks better, right from the camera, and unless you are employing well-paid assistants to render your RAW files for you, why would you bother with anything but the manufacturer's software?  Time is money.  Lightroom's organizational skills are handy,, but who cares when you have to spend EONS just to get a RAW file to resemble what could have been a JPEG from the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found it odd that people continue to use Adobe products to process RAW files.  They look inexcusably AWFUL and it&#8217;s no surprise that real pros.  That&#8217;s, REAL pros&#8230;Joe McNally, Bruce Dale, etc&#8230;not the online pros that abound these days&#8230;.do not use softwares such as Lightroom or Aperture.  They use Capture NX, or Canon&#8217;s DPP.  Why?  It looks better, right from the camera, and unless you are employing well-paid assistants to render your RAW files for you, why would you bother with anything but the manufacturer&#8217;s software?  Time is money.  Lightroom&#8217;s organizational skills are handy,, but who cares when you have to spend EONS just to get a RAW file to resemble what could have been a JPEG from the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finding The Perfect Photo Effect: The Gazebo by Belle</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/12/04/finding-the-perfect-photo-effect-the-gazebo/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/?p=544#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>I love the look it is beautiful, then only thing I would have done would have been to apply a mask and keep the dress more white simply  because it is a wedding dress . but it is a beautiful photo.

Belle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the look it is beautiful, then only thing I would have done would have been to apply a mask and keep the dress more white simply  because it is a wedding dress . but it is a beautiful photo.</p>
<p>Belle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lightroom Catalogs &#038; Photo Managment For Pro&#8217;s by Jim</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/10/15/lightroom-catalogs-photo-managment-pro/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/?p=312#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Love this tip. This is exactly the way I work. I shoot a job and I dont look at it for months or ever again yet it clutters my catalog. I'm in the process of exporting all jobs to their main images folder. I like the idea of having everything kept in the same place. Im planning to have a studio catalog for all my samples and all the the portfolio work/finished work and a personal catalog to contain all my family/kids/friends images.

thanks for writing it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this tip. This is exactly the way I work. I shoot a job and I dont look at it for months or ever again yet it clutters my catalog. I&#8217;m in the process of exporting all jobs to their main images folder. I like the idea of having everything kept in the same place. Im planning to have a studio catalog for all my samples and all the the portfolio work/finished work and a personal catalog to contain all my family/kids/friends images.</p>
<p>thanks for writing it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Actions for making easy Watermarks by dora</title>
		<link>http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/2008/08/31/actions-for-making-easy-watermarks/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>dora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotoshow.net/seim_effects/?p=211#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. Here is another way to create watermark: http://watermarkz.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. Here is another way to create watermark: <a href="http://watermarkz.net/" rel="nofollow">http://watermarkz.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
